David Rodriguez v. The Malaise Law Firm, Individually, Stephen Cennamo, Individually and as Employee of The Malaise Law Firm, and John Amos Longoria, Sr., Individually --Appeal from 408th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00596-CV David RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE MALAISE LAW FIRM, Individually, Stephen Cennamo, Individually and as Employee of The Malaise Law Firm, and John Amos Longoria, Sr., Individually, Appellees From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-CI-11758 Honorable Victor Hugo Negron Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 31, 2012 DISMISSED Pro se appellant David Rodriguez filed a notice of appeal and an affidavit of indigence with this court. On September 28, 2012, we abated this appeal to the trial court to allow a contest to appellant s affidavit of indigence. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1; Higgins v. Randall Cnty. Sheriff s Office, 257 S.W.3d 684, 688 (Tex. 2008). On October 19, 2012, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal; the motion included a certificate of service on appellees. To date, appellees have not filed any objection to appellant s motion. 04-12-00596-CV Therefore, we withdraw our September 28, 2012 order abating this appeal. We reinstate this appeal on this court s docket, grant appellant s motion, and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d). PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
