Jonese M. Ortegon, et al. v. Housing Authority of Bexar County--Appeal from County Court At Law No. 10 of Bexar County (per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00546-CV Jonese M. ORTEGON, et al., Appellants v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BEXAR COUNTY, Appellee From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 375315 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 10, 2012 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellants were required to pay $175.00 and $10.00 fees when they filed their notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5.1 Appellants did not pay the required fees. Accordingly, the clerk of this court notified appellants by letter dated August 27, 2012, that the notice of appeal was conditionally filed and the filing fees were due no later than September 7, 2012. 1 See also TEX. GOV T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b)(1), 51.941(a) (West 2005); id. §§ 51.208, 51.0051 (West Supp. 2010); Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B.l.(a). 04-12-00546-CV On September 12, 2012, when the fees remained unpaid, this court ordered appellants to provide written proof to this court not later than September 27, 2012, that either (1) the $175.00 and $10.00 filing fees have been paid, or (2) the parties are entitled to appeal without paying the filing fees. See id. We warned appellants that if they failed to respond as ordered, the appeal would be dismissed. See id. R. 42.3. To date, appellants have not filed any response with this court. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellants. See id. R. 43.4. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.