Janette Michelle Gamez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 12 of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00538-CR Janette Michelle GAMEZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 12, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 392923 Honorable Scott Roberts, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 31, 2012 DISMISSED Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Janette Michelle Gamez pled guilty to the offense of misdemeanor theft. The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, the clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(e). The clerk s record, 04-12-00538-CR which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The clerk s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After reviewing the clerk s record, the trial court s certification therefore appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk s record to determine whether trial court s certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On September 6, 2012. we gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing she has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record by October 8, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App. San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref d) (not designated for publication). An amended certification showing appellant has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
