HLI Rail and Rigging, LLC. v. Kansas City Southern Rail Way Company and Texas Mexican Railroad Company, Lone Star Railroad Contractors, Inc., Mexrail, Inc., Felipe Nevarez, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company AIG Mexico Seguros Interamericana, SA. de C.V. Chartis Mexico, Zass Recuperos --Appeal from 229th Judicial District Court of Duval County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00383-CV HLI RAIL AND RIGGING, LLC, Appellant v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAIL WAY COMPANY, Texas Mexican Railroad Company, Lone Star Railroad Contractors, Inc., Mexrail, Inc., Felipe Nevarez, Fireman s Fund Insurance Company, AIG Mexico Securos Interamericana, S.A. de C.V. Chartis Mexico, Zass Recuperos S.A. de C.V., and City Underwriting Agency, Inc. Appellees From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-10-338 Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 21, 2012 APPELLANT S MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED Appellant s brief was due October 15, 2012. When appellant failed to file the brief, appellee Lone Star Railroad Contractors, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). We held appellee s motion for ten days to permit appellant to file a response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). We held it an additional ten days pursuant to the mailbox rule. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b). On the tenth day, appellant filed its own motion to dismiss the appeal, stating it no longer desired to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, 04-12-00383-CV we grant appellant s motion to dismiss the appeal, and deny appellee s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant). PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
