Tom Haag, Gary Schwenk and U.S. Axles v. Best Used Tractors, LLC--Appeal from 285th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00371-CV Tom HAAG, Gary Schwenk and U.S. Axles, Appellants v. BEST USED TRACTORS, LLC, Appellee From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CI-14177 The Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 7, 2012 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellants were required to pay $175.00 and $10.00 fees when they filed their notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5.1 Appellants did not pay the required fees. Accordingly, the clerk of this court notified appellants by letter dated June 19, 2012, that the notice of appeal was conditionally filed and the filing fees were due no later than June 29, 2012. 1 See also TEX. GOV T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b)(1), 51.941(a) (West 2005); id. §§ 51.208, 51.0051 (West Supp. 2010); Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B.l.(a). 04-12-00371-CV On October 9, 2012, when the fees remained unpaid, this court ordered appellants to provide written proof to this court not later than October 24, 2012, that either (1) the $175.00 and $10.00 filing fees have been paid, or (2) the appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the filing fees. See id. We warned appellants that if they failed to respond as ordered, the appeal would be dismissed. See id. R. 5, 42.3; In re W.J.C., No. 04-05-00532-CV, 2005 WL 3477883, at *1 (Tex. App. San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). To date, appellants have not filed any response with this court. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellants. See id. R. 43.4. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
