Gary A. Campbell v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 226th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00304-CR Gary A. CAMPBELL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CR-2859 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 5, 2012 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Gary Campbell pled no contest to a felony and on August 4, 2008, the trial court sentenced him in accordance with the terms of his plea bargain agreement. Campbell did not file a motion for new trial. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was therefore September 3, 2008. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Campbell filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on May 15, 2012. 04-12-00304-CR We subsequently issued an order advising Campbell that his notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and directing him to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Both Campbell and his court-appointed attorney responded; the responses, however, fail to state a basis on which this court may accept jurisdiction of the appeal. Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-oftime appeals from felony convictions). Moreover, the notice of appeal fails to specify one of the allowable bases for appealing a plea-bargained felony conviction and thus fails to comply with Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court would therefore have no jurisdiction over the appeal even if the notice of appeal had been timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
