Procopio Hinojosa and Henry Hinojosa, Individually and as next of friend of Luis Hinojosa, a Minor v. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company--Appeal from 49th Judicial District Court of Zapata County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00221-CV Procopio HINOJOSA and Henry Hinojosa, Individually and as next Friend of Luis Hinojosa, a Minor Child, Appellants v. FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas Trial Court No. 6978 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 22, 2012 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION On May 23, 2012, we ordered Procopio Hinojosa to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the record did not contain a final judgment. We suspended all deadlines and ordered the response be filed by June 7, 2012. On June 7, 2012, Procopio Hinojosa filed her response, asserting the parties had submitted an agreed motion and order to sever the judgment related to Procopio Hinojosa s claims from rest of the case. As of 04-12-00221-CV July 3, 2012, no supplemental clerk s record containing an order of severance had been filed in this court. We then ordered Procopio Hinojosa to request the clerk prepare a supplemental record with an order establishing our jurisdiction within twenty days from the date of that order or we would dismiss this appeal. The deadline to file the supplemental clerk s record was July 23, 2012. No supplemental record was filed. Because the trial court granted a new trial to Henry Hinojosa, but not to Procopio Hinojosa, the trial court judgment is not final and appealable. See Lehmann v. Har Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (judgment is final and appealable when it determines the rights of all parties and disposes of all issues); Hall v. City of Austin, 450 S.W.2d 836, 837 38 (Tex. 1970) ( A severance divides the lawsuit into two or more separate and independent causes. After a severance, a judgment which disposes of all parties and issues in one of the severed causes is final and appealable. ). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
