In the Interest of J. A. T., et al Children--Appeal from 224th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00183-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J. A. T., et al., Children From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00437 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 29, 2012 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISICTION Appellant Fernando C. Puente attempts to appeal from a final order terminating his parental rights. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. ยง 263.405. The trial court entered a final order of termination on December 17, 2009, but signed a nunc pro tunc termination order on March 2, 2011. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due on March 22, 2011. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b) (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within twenty days after the judgment is signed in an accelerated appeal). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal, if necessary, was due on April 6, 2011. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 (providing a fifteen-day grace period after the deadline for filing notice of appeal). Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until March 26, 2012, approximately one year after the deadlines for filing the notice of 04-12-00183-CV appeal and motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal had expired. See id. Once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule 26.3 has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court s jurisdiction. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). On June 4, 2012, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing within twenty days why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. After requesting additional time to respond, appellant filed a written response and supplemental response explaining that he did not receive notice of the final order terminating his parental rights until November 18, 2011, and requesting that this court consider this explanation for the untimely filing of his notice of appeal. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(4); TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(a). Rules 306a(4) and 4.2(a) provide for an extended time period for perfecting an appeal when a party affected by a judgment does not receive notice, or acquire actual knowledge, of the judgment within twenty days after the date the judgment is signed; however, both rules also expressly state that in no event may the period[] begin more than 90 days after the judgment or order was signed. Id. Here, appellant states that he first received actual notice of the termination order on November 18, 2011 more than ninety days after the nunc pro tunc termination order was signed on March 2, 2011. Therefore, the extended time period for perfecting an appeal contemplated by Rule of Civil Procedure 306a(4) and Rule of Appellate Procedure 4.2(a) does not apply in this situation. Under these circumstances, we cannot help but conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). All pending motions filed by appellant are moot. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
