County of Bexar v. State National Insurance Company and Star Insurance Company--Appeal from 57th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00072-CV COUNTY OF BEXAR, Appellant v. STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Star Insurance Company, Appellees From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CI-20472 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 21, 2012 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant filed the notice of appeal on February 2, 2012. After the appellate record was filed, we abated the appeal until May 10, 2012 so that the parties could mediate. The abatement was then extended to July 18, 2012. Thereafter, the court was advised that mediation was not successful. We then ordered appellant to file a motion to dismiss the appeal, or we would reinstate the appeal on the court s docket and appellant s brief would be due thirty days after the date of the order reinstating the appeal. On September 12, 2012, we reinstated the appeal on the court s docket, and order appellant to file the appellant s brief on or before October 11, 2012. 04-12-00072-CV The brief was not filed. Therefore, on October 22, 2012, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by November 6, 2012 why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). To date, appellant has not filed a brief or the written response ordered by the court. We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (court may dismiss appeal because appellant has failed to comply with a court order within the time provided). Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.