Thomas Huddleston v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 226th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION Nos. 04-11-00788-CR; 04-11-00789-CR & 04-11-00790-CR Thomas HUDDLESTON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2002CR2762B; 2002CR 6510B & 2002 CR6511B Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 7, 2011 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant filed a notice of appeal in each of these appeals seeking to appeal the trial court s order denying his motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc. The denial of a motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc, however, is not an appealable order. See Caceras v. State, No. 04-1000132-CR, 2010 WL 726884, at *1 (Tex. App. San Antonio Mar. 3, 2010, no pet.) (not designated for publication); Castor v. State, 205 S.W.3d 666, 667 (Tex. App. Waco 2006, no pet.). Instead, the proper remedy to obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc 04-11-00788-CR; 04-11-00789-CR & 04-11-00790-CR pro tunc is by petition for writ of mandamus. Caceras, 2010 WL 726884, at *1; Castor, 205 S.W.3d at 667. On November 8, 2011, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why these appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond to our order. The appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
