Emilio Aleman and Isabel C. Aleman v. Manuela Zavala, Consuelo Tinajero, Angelina Zavala, Gilbert Zavala, et al--Appeal from 131st Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00282-CV Emilio ALEMAN and Isabel C. Aleman, Appellants v. Manuela ZAVALA, Consuelo Tinajero, Angelina Zavala, Gilbert Zavala, et al, Appellees From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-CI-16346 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 6, 2010 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION The reporter s record was originally due on May 7, 2010. On May 21, 2010, this court notified the court reporter that the reporter s record was late. The court reporter responded to our notice by filing a Notification of Late Record stating the reporter s record was not filed because appellants have not requested a reporter s record. If appellants desire a reporter s record to be filed in this appeal, they must request that a reporter s record be prepared. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1). Accordingly, on June 8, 2010, this court issued an order ordering appellants to (1) 04-10-00282-CV request in writing that a reporter s record be prepared and (2) designate in writing the exhibits and those portions of the record to be included in the reporter s record, if they desired a reporter s record. Id. The appellants were also ordered to file a copy of the request with both the trial court clerk, id. at 34.6(b)(2), and this court. Our order informed appellants that if they failed to respond within the time provided, their brief would be due within thirty (30) days from the date of the June 8, 2010 order, and the court would only consider those issues or points raised in appellants brief that do not require a reporter s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Because appellants did not request a reporter s record, their brief, without reference to the reporter s record was due on July 8, 2010. No response was filed. Accordingly, on July 20, 2010, appellants were ordered to file their brief no later than August 9, 2010. Our order informed appellants that if they failed to file the brief within the time provided the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellants did not respond. Accordingly, on August 30, 2010, appellants were ordered to show cause in writing, no later than September 10, 2010, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. No response has been filed. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellants. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
