In the Interest of R. E. N., A Child--Appeal from 37th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00815-CV In the Interest of R.E.N., a Child From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-PA-01635 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 28, 2010 AFFIRMED, MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED After the trial court terminated his parental rights to R.E.N., appellant G.C.N. appealed the trial court s order determining that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous.1 See TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . § 263.405(g) (Vernon 2008). Appellant s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In the Interest of R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental ¦ To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the parent and child by initials only. See T EX . F AM . C O D E A N N . § 109.002(d) (Vernon 2009). 1 04-09-00815-CV rights). Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief. Additionally, appellant was informed of his right to review the record and advised of his right to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We grant counsel s motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Karen Angelini, Justice -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.