In the Interest of T.C., et al., Children--Appeal from 225th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i OPINION No. 04-09-00126-CV IN THE INTEREST OF T.C. and J.C. From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-PA-01834 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 31, 2009 RECORD ORDERED This is an appeal from the trial court s order terminating appellant s parental rights. After the trial court signed the termination order, appellant filed a Motion for New Trial and Statement of Appellate Points, in which appellant challenged the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence in support of the findings on which the termination order was based. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion for new trial, sustained appellant s affidavit of indigence, and ruled that the appeal was frivolous. On appeal to this court, appellant again challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, as well as asserting he did not receive effective assistance of counsel. 04-09-00126-CV We review a trial court s determination that an appeal is frivolous under an abuse of discretion standard. In re M.R.J.M., 193 S.W.3d 670, 673 (Tex. App. Fort Worth 2006, no pet.) (en banc). After reviewing the record from the new trial hearing, we are unable to determine whether the trial court acted within its discretion from that record alone. Therefore, we conclude a review of the reporter s record from the termination proceeding is necessary to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion. See In re D.M., No. 04-08-00264-CV, 2008 WL 4500310, at *2 n.2 (Tex. App. San Antonio Oct. 8, 2008, no pet.); In re M.R.J.M., 193 S.W.3d at 675-76; In re S.T., 242 S.W.3d 923, 925 (Tex. App. Waco 2008, no pet.); M.C. v. Tex. Dep t of Family & Prot. Servs., No. 08-08-00053-CV, 2008 WL 5175879, at *1 (Tex. App. El Paso Dec. 11, 2008, no pet.). But see In re R.C.R., No. 14-08-00904-CV, 2009 WL 997514, at *3 n.4 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no pet.); In re A.S., 239 S.W.3d 390, 391-93 (Tex. App. Beaumont 2007, no pet.). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the court reporters shall, on or before thirty (30) days from the date of this opinion and order, and without cost to the appellant, prepare and file reporter s records containing all of the evidence admitted at the termination trial.1 Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice ¦ See T EX . R. A PP . P. 34.6(d). This order does not require the court reporters to prepare reporter s records of any nonevidentiary portions of the trial, such as pretrial hearings, voir dire, closing arguments, and postjudgment proceedings. 1 -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
