Nora M. Reynosa v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 290th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00168-CR Nora M. REYNOSA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-11839W Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 12, 2010 DISMISSED Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant, Nora Reynosa, pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. On January 21, 2010, the trial court imposed sentence and signed a certification of defendant s right to appeal stating that this is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant filed a notice of appeal, the 04-10-00168-CR court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(e). Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in which she asserts the substance of the appeal was raised in a written motion ruled on before trial. The clerk s record contains a written plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to by the appellant. The clerk s record does not contain any orders ruling on pre-trial motions. Rule 25.2(d) provides, The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules. TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on March 16, 2010, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App. San Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court certification has been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.