Ex Parte Ruben Vasquez--Appeal from 73rd Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00289-CV EX PARTE Ruben VASQUEZ Writ of Habeas Corpus Proceeding1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 28, 2010 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED On April 9, 2010, relator Ruben Vasquez filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, apparently seeking relief from an order holding him in contempt for failure to pay child support arrearages and attorney s fees related thereto. Vasquez filed supplements to his petition on April 12, 2010, and April 13, 2010. We have reviewed the documents filed by relator and are unable to determine the grounds upon which he seeks relief. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.3(h) (petition must contain clear and concise argument for contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to appendix or record). Moreover, relator has not provided this Court with a single document in support of his 1 ¦ This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2004-EM -505017, styled In the Interest of A.V., A Child, in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. Although the Honorable Renée McElhaney presides over the 73rd Judicial District Court, the contempt order in this case was signed by Associate Judge Jim Rausch. 04-10-00210-CR petition. A relator has the burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish a right to relief. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.7(a) (requiring relator to file with petition a certified or sworn copy of every document material to relator s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding); see also TEX . R. APP . P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), (D). Based on the foregoing, we conclude relator has not shown himself entitled to relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
