In the Matter of A.B., Jr., III--Appeal from 386th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00321-CV In the MATTER OF A.B. JR. III From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-JUV-02400 Honorable Laura L. Parker, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2008 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED Pursuant to a plea agreement, A.B. Jr. III pleaded true to the State s petition alleging he committed the offense of possession of marihuana, two ounces or less, within one thousand feet of a school. The trial court followed the plea agreement and placed A.B. on probation for nine months in the custody of his grandmother. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to modify disposition alleging A.B. violated conditions of his probation. A.B. pleaded true to the violations alleged in the State s motion. The trial court found A.B. violated the conditions as alleged by the State and determined there was a need for disposition. After the disposition hearing, the trial court extended A.B. s probation for fifteen months and ordered that it be served in the custody of the Chief Juvenile Probation Officer of Bexar County. A.B. filed a notice of appeal. 04 08-00321-CV A.B. s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which she asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). See In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Tex. 1998) (Anders procedures apply to appeals from juvenile delinquency adjudications); In re A.L.H., 974 S.W.2d 359, 360 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (same). Counsel states she has provided the juvenile and his guardian copies of the brief and motion to withdraw and informed them of the juvenile s right to review the record and file his own brief. See A.L.H., 974 S.W.2d at 360-61; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App. San Antonio, 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1996, no pet.). No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record and counsel s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by A.B. s counsel and affirm the trial court s judgment. See id.; Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. Steven C. Hilbig, Justice -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
