Albert De Los Santos v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this CaseMEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-06-00682-CR
No. 04-06-00683-CR
Albert DE LOS SANTOS
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 2005-CR-6550 & 2005-CR-6551
Honorable Phil Chavarria, Jr., Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 14, 2007
AFFIRMED
The trial court convicted defendant of the felony offenses of possession with intent to sell heroin and cocaine, and assessed punishment at forty years' confinement.
Defendant's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Defendant was informed of his right to review the record. Counsel provided defendant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief. Defendant did not file a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the entire appellate record, and we conclude there are no arguable grounds for appeal, there is no reversible error, and the appeal is wholly frivolous.
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgments, and we GRANT appellate counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.