Raynor Telefaris Cook v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 186th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

Annotate this Case

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

No. 04-06-00803-CR

 

Raynor Telefaris COOK,

Appellant

 

v.

 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

 

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-CR-1142

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding (1)

 

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 12, 2007

 

AFFIRMED

Defendant, Raynor Telefaris Cook, pled no contest to aggravated sexual assault of a child, pursuant to an open plea. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court assessed punishment at thirty years' confinement and a $1,500 fine.

Defendant's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Defendant was informed of his right to review the record. Counsel provided defendant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief. Defendant has not filed a brief.

After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

 

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH

1. The Honorable Maria Teresa Herr is the presiding judge of the 186th Judicial District Court. The Honorable Pat Priest, sitting by assignment, presided over the plea hearing. Judge Herr presided over the sentencing hearing and signed the judgment of conviction.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.