In the Interest of A.H., a Child--Appeal from 73rd Judicial District Court of Bexar County

Annotate this Case
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-06-00877-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.H.
From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2006-PA-00260
Honorable Joe Frazier Brown, Jr., Judge Presiding (1)

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

 

Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

 

Delivered and Filed: August 8, 2007

 

AFFIRMED

This is an appeal from the trial court's termination of appellant's parental rights. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 161.001(1)(D), (E), (N), (O), (Q), (2) (Vernon 2002). Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., NO. 04-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.--San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief. Appellant was informed of his right to review the record and advised of his right to file a pro se brief. Appellant has not filed a brief.

After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

 

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

 

1. The Honorable Andy Mireles is the presiding judge of the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. However, the Honorable Richard Garcia, Associate Judge, Bexar County, Texas, presided over the parental termination proceeding and signed the judgment that is at issue in this appeal. The Honorable Joe Frazier Brown, Jr., the presiding judge of the 57th Judicial District Court, adopted the order of termination.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.