In re Michael Kennedy--Appeal from 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

Annotate this Case

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

No. 04-05-00822-CV

 

IN RE Michael KENNEDY

 

Original Mandamus Proceeding //

 

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 14, 2005

 

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IN PART AND DENIED IN PART

 

Michael Kennedy has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to compel the trial court and the district clerk to file a petition and issue a citation. Kennedy represents that, although he sent the petition to the district clerk on August 13, 2004, it has not been acted upon by the district clerk. // We dismiss Kennedy s petition for lack of jurisdiction in part and deny it in part.

A petition commencing a civil action must be filed with the district clerk. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 22. Similarly, when the issuance of a citation is properly requested by a party, the duty to issue the citation rests upon the district clerk. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 99. However, this court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless it is necessary to enforce this court s jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. 22.221 (Vernon 2004); In re Lann, 2004 WL 1881751, at *1 (Tex. App. San Antonio, August 25, 2004, orig. proceeding); In re Dunn, 120 S.W.3d 913, 913 (Tex. App. Texarkana 2003, orig. proceeding). Kennedy has not alleged or established that a writ of mandamus directed to the district clerk is necessary to enforce this court s jurisdiction. Therefore, that part of Kennedy s petition seeking a writ of mandamus directed to the district clerk is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The trial court has no duty to file a petition or issue a citation. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 22, 99. Accordingly, to the extent Kennedy s petition seeks a writ of mandamus directed to the trial court, he has failed to establish either that the trial court has abused its discretion or violated a legal duty. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Therefore, Kennedy s petition seeking a writ of mandamus directed to the trial court is denied.

PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.