Ex-Parte Omar Lugo--Appeal from 399th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

Annotate this Case

OPINION

 

No. 04-05-00068-CR

 

EX PARTE OMAR LUGO

 

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. NM802660

Honorable Juanita Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

 

Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2005

 

AFFIRMED

 

On July 11, 2004, defendant, Omar Lugo, was arrested and charged with intoxication manslaughter. On January 13, 2005, defendant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus, asserting he was not timely indicted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 32.01. On January 20, 2005, the trial court conducted a hearing on the application and denied the requested relief.

Pursuant to article 32.01, the State had to file the charging instrument on or before the last day of the next term of the court which is held after his commitment or admission to bail or on or before the 180th day after the date of commitment or admission to bail, whichever date is later. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 32.01 (Vernon Supp. 2005) (emphasis added). In Bexar County, grand juries are impaneled for two-month terms. See Bexar County Crim. Dist. Ct. Rule 5.5. According to defendant, he was arrested during the July-August 2004 term of the 144th Judicial District Court; the next term of the 175th Judicial District Court ended on October 31, 2004; and by the time he filed his application for writ of habeas corpus on January 13, 2005, he had yet to be indicted. Therefore, defendant contends article 32.01 mandates dismissal of the criminal prosecution against him. Defendant also argues dismissal of the prosecution is required because more than 180 days have passed since the date of his commitment. We disagree. Although the Bexar County local rules require a criminal district judge to impanel grand juries in accordance with a two-month schedule, this two-month schedule does not control the terms of the Bexar County courts. Instead, the provisions of the Texas Government Code control.

The terms of the Bexar County district courts, which give preference to criminal cases, are established by statute, and begin on the first Monday in January and July and continue until the court has disposed of the business for that term. Tex. Gov t Code Ann. 24.139 (Vernon 2004). Because defendant was arrested during the July to December 2004 term, the last day of the next term of the court held after defendant s commitment is the end of the January to June 2005 term. Accordingly, because defendant s application for writ of habeas corpus is premature, article 32.01 does not require dismissal of the prosecution against him, and the trial court did not err in denying his application.

 

We overrule defendant s issues // on appeal and affirm the trial court s judgment.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

PUBLISH

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.