Ana Maria Falcon, et al. v. Transportes Aereos De Coahuila, S.A. a/k/a TACSA, et al.--Appeal from 365th Judicial District Court of Maverick County
Annotate this CaseNo. 04-01-00031-CV
Ana Maria FALCON, et al.,Appellants
v.
TRANSPORTES AEREOS DE COAHUILA, S.A. a/k/a TACSA,
Appellee
From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas
Trial Court No. 97-10-14819-CV
Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Alma L. L pez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 28, 2001
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
The appellants seek to appeal the trial court's order dismissing the appellee from the underlying lawsuit based on the mandate issued by this court in appeal number 04-99-00047-CV. See Transportes Aereos De Coahuila, S.A. v. Falcon, 5 S.W.3d 712 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1999, pet denied). The trial court had a ministerial duty to comply with the mandate issued by this court on July 11, 2000. This court lacks any jurisdiction to recall its mandate or otherwise alter the judgment dismissing the appellee from the underlying cause. See Tex. R. App. P. 19.1, 19.3; Kacal v. Cohen, 13 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. App.--Waco 2000, no pet.). If appellants wished to withdraw their concession that specific jurisdiction was not applicable, the concession needed to be withdrawn before we lost jurisdiction to reconsider our judgment and recall our mandate. We do not have jurisdiction to consider a challenge to the mandate issued by this court on July 11, 2000, in accordance with this court's judgment in appeal number 04-99-00047-CV. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellants.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.