In re Ramel Blue Appeal from 387th District Court of Fort Bend County (dissenting memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed August 29, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00603-CV IN RE RAMEL BLUE, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22-DCV-298913 MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION Persisting in my view that our duty as judges is to reach a decision on the merits, based on a proper record, and that due process and due course of law require that this court give notice when the original-proceeding record does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I would give relator ten-days’ notice of involuntary dismissal for failure to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a) requiring: (1) a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding and (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained. Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); see In re Kholaif, 624 S.W.3d 228, 231 (order), mand. dism’d, 615 S.W.3d 369 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, no pet.) (orig. proceeding); see also Tex. R. 52.3(k)(1) (necessary contents of petition); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Crim. Code Ann. § 132.001 (authorizing unsworn declarations). I dissent from the court’s failure to provide notice and an opportunity to cure. I would not rule on the motion for temporary relief at this time. I express no opinion on the merits of the petition for a writ of mandamus. /s/ Charles A. Spain Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Spain (Spain, J., dissenting). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.