Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez v. The State of Texas Appeal from 338th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 2, 2023 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00901-CR ESTANISLADO ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 338th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1616060 MEMORANDUM OPINION Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez appeals his conviction of super-aggravated sexual assault of a child. His sole issue on appeal alleges that trial counsel violated McCoy v. Louisiana, which prohibits defense counsel from conceding guilt over a defendant’s objection to maintain his innocence. 138 S. Ct. 1500, 1509 (2018). The Turner court addressed, inter alia, whether the defendant had preserved error on his McCoy complaint. Turner v. State, 570 S.W.3d 250, 275–76 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018). Although a defendant is not expected to object with the precision of an attorney, the court held that a defendant cannot remain silent before and during trial and raise a McCoy complaint for the first time after trial. Id. at 276. But see Harrison v. State, 595 S.W.3d 879, 885 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, pet. ref’d) (concluding that the defendant preserved error on her McCoy complaint by filing a motion for new trial at the first opportunity after learning about the trial court’s statement that deferred adjudication would not be considered). To preserve a McCoy complaint, a defendant must present “express statements of [his] will to maintain innocence.” Turner, 570 S.W.3d at 276. Appellant acknowledges that he did not object to his trial counsel’s statements at trial. Likewise, the record does not indicate that appellant otherwise presented “express statements of [his] will to maintain innocence.” Id. Thus, appellant forfeited any error by failing to timely object. Id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 33.1. Accordingly, appellant waived his sole issue on appeal. We overrule his sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment. /s/ Frances Bourliot Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan. Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
