Darrell J. Harper v. Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector and Ann Harris Bennett Appeal from 295th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 1, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00639-CV DARRELL J. HARPER, Appellant V. HARRIS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR AND ANN HARRIS BENNETT, Appellees On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-13792 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from an order of dismissal. Pursuant to chapter 11 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, appellant Darrell J. Harper has been declared a vexatious litigant and is therefore subject to the pre-filing order under section 11.101. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.101, 11.103. Under section 11.103(a), the clerk of this court may not file an appeal presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a pre-filing order under section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing or the appeal is from a pre-filing order entered under section 11.101 designating the person a vexatious litigant. Id. § 11.103(a) & (d). This is not an appeal from a pre-filing order entered under section 11.101. Our record contains no indication appellant obtained permission to file this appeal. On November 1, 2022, we notified appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal without further notice unless appellant filed a copy of the order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing of this appeal. See id. § 11.103(a). Appellant did not file a response. Because appellant has not provided sufficient proof that he obtained permission to file this appeal from the local administrative judge, we must dismiss this appeal. The appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.