Calvin Earl Basey Senior v. The State of Texas Appeal from 21st District Court of Washington County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00528-CR CALVIN EARL BASEY SENIOR, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 21st District Court Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18699 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant was convicted of evading arrest with a vehicle and sentenced to twenty-five year’s confinement on December 10, 2021. See Tex. Penal Code § 38.04. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by January 10, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A court of appeals may grant an extension of time if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files (a) the notice of appeal in the trial court, and (b) a motion for extension of time in the court of appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; see also Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2) (governing motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal). The fifteenth day after January 10, 2022, was January 25, 2022. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on July 18, 2022, a date that is not within 15 days of the due date. A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). When a notice of appeal is not filed within the 15-day period, the court of appeals can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. On August 24, 2022, the parties were notified that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. No response has been received. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.