In the Interest of M.E.F-C., and J.A.F-C., Jr. a/k/a J.C., Jr.,children Appeal from 313th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 16, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00151-CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.E.F.-C. AND J.A.F.-C., JR. A/K/A J.C., JR., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 313th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-02619J MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, D.E.H., appeals a final decree signed February 17, 2022, terminating her parental rights to the two children who are the subject of this suit. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The Anders procedures apply to an appeal from the termination of parental rights when an appointed attorney concludes there are no non-frivolous issues to assert on appeal. In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d 326, 329 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). On April 27, 2022, appellant was notified of the right to file a pro se response to the Anders brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d at 329-30. More than thirty days have elapsed and as of this date, no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
