In re D.S.W., a child Appeal from 247th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00700-CV IN RE D.S.W., Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 247th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-88778 MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator D.S.W filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Janice Berg, presiding judge of the 247th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her August 1, 2019 order granting a default judgment against relator or, alternatively, rule on relator’s bill of review that he alleges was filed in May 2021. We sent relator notice that his petition did not comply with the applicable Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (providing that appendix must contain certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the document complained of); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) (requiring relator to file with petition certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to relator’s claim and that was filed in any underlying proceeding); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(2) (requiring relator to file with petition properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with matter complained of); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 132.001(e) (providing that unsworn declaration from inmate may be used in lieu of written sworn declaration).1 We further gave relator notice that his petition would be dismissed unless relator filed (1) an amended petition and record that complies with Rule 52 including unsworn declarations at the end of both the amended petition and record or (2) an unsworn declaration that specifically describes and authenticates the orders, documents, transcripts, and exhibits attached to relator’s previously filed mandamus appendix or record. Relator has not cured all defects in his petition. Specifically, relator has not filed an unsworn declaration made under penalty of perjury. Instead, relator stated: “The information in the appendix to my original petition and record in the above styled cause, any order complained of, including any orders, transcripts and exhibits attached with the original petition, and every document that is material to my claim 1 Relator is an incarcerated inmate. 2 for relief, and everything else I submitted to this Honorable Court, whether explicitly mentioned in this declaration or not, including exhibits offered in evidence, declarations, letters and any other or any other documents submitted by me in the original petition is true and correct to my knowledge.” An unsworn declaration made under this section must be: (1) in writing; and (2) subscribed by the person making the declaration as true under penalty of perjury. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 132.001(c). “The inclusion of the phrase ‘under penalty of perjury’ is the key to allowing an unsworn declaration to replace an affidavit.” Dominguez v. State, 441 S.W.3d 652, 658 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet. ref’d) (citing Bahm v. State, 219 S.W.3d 391, 393–94 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (applying prior version of statute that limited use of unsworn declarations to inmates)). Merely stating that documents are “true and correct to my knowledge” is insufficient to authenticate documents under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a) and Civil Practices and Remedies Code section 132.001(e).2 2 The form for the unsworn inmate declaration is: My name is ___________________ __________________ __________________, (First) (Middle) (Last) my date of birth is _________________, and my inmate identifying number, if any, is ___________________________________. I am presently incarcerated in _____________________________________________ (Corrections unit name) in ________________, _______________, ________________, _______________. (City) (County) (State) (Zip Code) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the _________ day of _______________, _______________. (Month) (Year) ______________________________________ Declarant Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 132.001(e). 3 Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also dismiss as moot relator’s motion for temporary relief and motion to proceed without payment of costs. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan. 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
