Ex Parte Medger Chauncey Duckens Appeal from 339th District Court of Harris County (concurring opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 4, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00576-CR EX PARTE MEDGER CHAUNCEY DUCKENS, Appellant On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1688385 CONCURRING OPINION I respectfully concur. The majority opinion discusses whether the State’s conduct in this case is substantially unconstitutional, thus implying that there is a permissible category of unconstitutional restrictions because they do not constitute a “substantial” violation. Because I believe that all unconstitutional restrictions should have a remedy but that the State’s actions are not unconstitutional in this case, I concur. /s/ Meagan Hassan Justice Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan (Jewell, J., majority). Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.