In re G.T.S., Appeal from 280th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 1, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00333-CV IN RE G.T.S., Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-26978 MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 17, 2021, relator G.T.S. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this courts to compel the Honorable Barbara Stadler, presiding judge of the 280th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her May 5, 2021 temporary ex parte protective order. A relator has the burden to provide the court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.3d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The relator has not met his burden. The appendix does not contain all documents referenced in relator’s petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1). Moreover, relator has not shown that he has made the required predicate request for relief. The right to mandamus relief generally requires a predicate request for action by the trial court and its erroneous refusal to act. In re Coppola, 535 S.W.3d 506, 510 (Tex. 2017). Relator did not ask the trial court to set aside the temporary ex parte order before seeking mandamus relief in this court, and the arguments raised in the petition have never been presented to the trial court. Finally, the appendix includes documents that contain unredacted sensitive information. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 prohibits the filing of documents containing sensitive information such as, in this case, the names of the minor children and their address. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9(a). Such information is required to be redacted. Id. 9.9(b). Relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Hassan. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
