City of Hempstead, Texas v. Sergio Zamora Appeal from 506th Judicial District Court of Waller County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 12, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00309-CV CITY OF HEMPSTEAD, TEXAS, Appellant V. SERGIO ZAMORA, Appellee On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV21-04-0123 MEMORANDUM OPINION This interlocutory appeal was brought from an order granting a temporary injunction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4). Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot because the trial court granted appellee’s motion to dissolve the temporary injunction on August 3, 2021. Appellant filed a response and appellee filed a reply. Appellant argues that (1) the temporary injunction was improperly granted and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in setting a “nominal bond.” We are prohibited from reviewing a temporary injunction that is moot because such a review would constitute an impermissible advisory opinion. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999); Parham Family Ltd. P’ship v. Morgan, No. 14-12-00195-CV, 2012 WL 3866504 at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 6, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.). When a temporary injunction becomes inoperative, the issue of its propriety is moot. Parham Family, 2012 WL 3866504 at *1. As to appellant’s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in setting the amount of bond, we are also without jurisdiction. See Legend Airlines, Inc. v. City of Fort Worth, 23 S.W.3d 83, 97 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, pet. denied) (stating, “[t]he propriety of the injunction and bond is now moot, however, because the trial court dissolved the injunction.”); Ridgepoint Rentals, LLC v. McGrath, No. 09-16-00393-CV, No. 09-17-0006-CV, 2017 WL 6062290 at *10 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Dec. 7, 2017, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (same). The order on appeal is inoperative. An opinion would be advisory. Appellee’s motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. 42.3(a). PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
