In re San Jacinto River Authority Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 1 of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motion Denied, Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00228-CV IN RE SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1139514 MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 3, 2021, relator San Jacinto River Authority (“SJRA”) filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221. SJRA asks this Court to order the Honorable George Barnstone, Judge of County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, Texas, to set aside his order dated April 13, 2021 requiring SJRA to make Hector Olmos and Mark Forest available for deposition during the week of May 10–14, 2021 (“the Order”). SJRA contends the Order violates Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 193.5(b). Contemporaneously with its petition for writ of mandamus, SJRA filed an emergency motion to stay the Order. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10. To obtain mandamus relief, a relator generally must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). A trial court clearly abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to a clear and prejudicial error of law or if it clearly fails to analyze the law correctly or apply the law correctly to the facts. In re Cerberus Capital Mgmt. L.P., 164 S.W.3d 379, 382 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). The appellate court reviews the trial court's application of the law de novo. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992). After reviewing the petition for mandamus and the mandamus record, we conclude SJRA has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion with respect to the Order. We deny both SJRA’s petition for writ of mandamus and its emergency motion to stay the Order. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Hassan. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.