Ikechukwu Chris Obudulu v. The State of Texas Appeal from 23rd District Court of Brazoria County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-01021-CR IKECHUKWU CHRIS OBUDULU, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 23rd District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 65035-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant attempts to appeal the denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court signed an order denying appellant’s application on June 20, 2018. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due July 20, 2018, but not filed until November 26, 2018. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. On November 30, 2018, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion is granted, and the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Donovan. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
