In re Christopher J. Russo Appeal from 295th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Leave to File Documents under Seal Dismissed, Emergency Motion to Enforce this Court’s Stay Order Denied, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 2, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00136-CV IN RE CHRISTOPHER J. RUSSO, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-24818 MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 21, 2018, relator Christopher J. Russo filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Caroline Baker, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her February 12, 2018 order, which compels relator to produce 1,538 documents, for which relator has asserted a Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution act-ofproduction privilege. Relator has submitted documents in camera and also has filed a motion for leave to file these documents with our court under seal. On February 22, 2018, this court issued an order staying the February 12, 2018 order. Relator also has filed an emergency motion to enforce this court’s stay order. We deny this motion. On March 1, 2018, Judge Baker vacated her February 12, 2018 order, which renders moot both relator’s petition for writ of mandamus to compel Judge Baker to vacate that order and relator’s pending motion to file documents under seal.1 Accordingly, we dismiss as moot relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and relator’s motion for leave to file documents under seal. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Jamison. 1 See In re Lexington Ins. Co., No. 14-11-00681-CV, 2011 WL 3925567, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 8, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (because the order compelling discovery that is the subject of this proceeding has been vacated, the original proceeding is moot); In re Diaz, No. 01-17-00868-CV, 2017 WL 6327365, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 12, 2017, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (dismissing mandamus proceeding as moot after the trial court vacated its order compelling discovery that was the subject of the proceeding); In re County of El Paso, 104 S.W.3d 741, 743 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, orig. proceeding) (discovery issues brought in petition for mandamus were rendered moot when after filing of petition, the trial court vacated its order). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
