Juan Carlos Ruvalcaba, Elam Meat Market, L.L.C., and Supermercado Latino, L.L.C. v. Rafael Ortega, Et Al Appeal from 215th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motion Granted; Judgment Vacated and Rendered, and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00206-CV JUAN CARLOS RUVALCABA, ELAM MEAT MARKET, L.L.C., AND SUPERMERCADO LATINO, L.L.C., Appellants V. RAFAEL ORTEGA, ET AL, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-33606 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a final judgment signed December 9, 2016 (“the Final Judgment”) and an order signed January 6, 2017, entitled, “Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Expulsion Juan Carlos Ruvalcaba” (“the Expulsion Order”). On August 17, 2018, the parties filed a “Joint Agreed Motion to Dismiss the Appeal and to Render Judgment that Sets Aside and Vacates the Underlying Final Judgment and Expulsion Order, to Effectuate the Parties’ Settlement Agreement.” The motion asks that we dismiss the appeal, vacate the Final Judgment and Expulsion Order, and mandate the Release of the Cash Deposit in Lieu of Bond pursuant to the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties’ request for both dismissal of the appeal and rendition of judgment in the appeal are mutually exclusive. Compare Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1) (dismiss) with Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A) (render judgment). From the motion, it appears the relief actually sought is that we render judgment to effectuate the parties’ settlement agreement. Accordingly, we rule as follows: 1. The parties’ motion is GRANTED. 2. We RENDER judgment effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement as follows: a. The Final Judgment is VACATED. b. The Expulsion Order is VACATED. 3. The $100,000 Case Deposit in Lieu of Bond paid by appellants is RELEASED. 4. Each party shall bear their own costs. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
