M & F Worldwide Corp., MCG Intermediate Holdings, Inc., MAFCO Worldwide Corporation, MAFCO Consolidated Group LLC and PCT International Holdings, Inc. v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company Appeal from 80th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motion granted; Vacated and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed May 2, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00045-CV M & F WORLDWIDE CORP., MCG INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., MAFCO WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, MAFCO CONSOLIDATED GROUP LLC AND PCT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., Appellants V. PEPSI-COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-77606 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying special appearances. On December 18, 2014, we issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s decision. On March 3, 2017, the Supreme Court of Texas reversed our judgment and remanded the case to this court for further proceedings. M&F Worldwide Corp. v. Pepsi-Cola Metro. Bottling Co., Inc., No. 15–0083, 2017 WL 889938 (Tex. Mar. 3, 2017). On April 19, 2017, the parties filed an agreed motion to remand this cause to the trial court to effectuate stipulation of dismissal. Specifically, the parties ask this court to reverse the trial court’s December 23, 2013 Order Denying Special Appearance and remand to the trial court for entry of judgment to effectuate the voluntary discontinuance of this action is accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties further request that all costs of appeal be borne by appellee Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company. The motion is granted. Accordingly, we vacate the order signed December 23, 2013, and we remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Jewell. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.