Leonard Watkins v. The State of Texas Appeal from 337th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 26, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00488-CR LEONARD WATKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 780878 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant was indicted for the offense of possession of more than 4 grams but less than 200 grams of cocaine. On June 16, 1998, he pleaded guilty; the trial court deferred adjudication and placed him on five years' probation. On the State’s motion, the trial court adjudicated appellant’s guilt and sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment. Appellant appealed from the order adjudicating guilt. Lacking jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a decision to adjudicate guilt, this court dismissed the appeal. See Watkins v. State, No. 14-98-01125-CR, 2001 WL 276701 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 22, 2001, no pet.) (not designated for publication). On May 26, 2016, appellant filed a request for permission to appeal the adjudication of guilt underlying his first appeal. The trial court denied the request. As in the first appeal, we lack jurisdiction over this second appeal. A defendant on deferred adjudication community supervision may not appeal the trial court’s adjudication of guilt. Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 909 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Further, the trial court’s jurisdiction expired when this case was appealed the first time. Yarbrough v. State, 703 S.W.2d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). A trial court then has only limited jurisdiction to perform functions specified by statute, such as finding facts on an application for writ of habeas corpus. State v. Patrick, 86 S.W.3d 592, 594 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). Without jurisdiction, the trial court had no power to grant appellant’s request for permission to appeal. See id. at 595. Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal. PER CURIAM Panel consists Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.