Petrolia Group, LLC and Petrolia Consolidated Resources, LLC v. Zimmerman, Axelrad, Meyer, Stern & Wise, PC and Brian Zimmerman Appeal from 80th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 12, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00468-CV PETROLIA GROUP, LLC AND PETROLIA CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES, LLC, Appellants V. ZIMMERMAN, AXELRAD, MEYER, STERN & WISE, PC AND BRIAN ZIMMERMAN, Appellees On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-09761 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from an order compelling arbitration signed May 13, 2016. On June 14, 2016, appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellants have not filed a response. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is entered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Here, the trial court’s order compelling arbitration remains interlocutory and unappealable; thus, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal. See Elm Creek Villas Homeowners Ass’n, Inc. v. Beldon Roofing & Remodeling, Co., 940 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no writ) (concluding court of appeals had no jurisdiction over interlocutory order compelling arbitration); Bethke v. Polyco, Inc., 730 S.W.2d 431, 434 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1987, no writ) (holding an order compelling arbitration is not an appealable judgment); Citizens Nat’l Bank of Beaumont v. Callaway, 597 S.W.2d 465, 466 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1980, writ ref’d) (holding appellate court has no jurisdiction over an order requiring the parties to arbitrate). Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
