In re Joyce M. Hutcherson, Rudolph J. Pusok and Jimmie R. Pusok Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed July 12, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00433-CV IN RE JOYCE M. HUTCHERSON, RUDOLPH J. PUSOK AND JIMMIE R. PUSOK, Relators ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1059926 MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 31, 2016, relators Joyce M. Hutcherson, Rudolph J. Pusok and Jimmie R. Pusok filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Roberta Llloyd, presiding judge of the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County, to (1) vacate her April 25, 2016 order that denied relators’ motion to enforce the parties’ Rule 11 scheduling agreement by striking the real party-in-interest Harris County’s Second Amended Petition as untimely under the agreement, and (2) enter an order enforcing the parties’ Rule 11 scheduling agreement. Relators also request a stay of the underlying trial court proceedings. To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relators have not established that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices McCally and Brown. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
