In re Marcus James Lewis Appeal from 182nd District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed March 3, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00137-CR IN RE MARCUS JAMEZ LEWIS, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 182nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1398109 MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 23, 2016, relator Marcus Jamez Lewis filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable James Anderson, presiding judge of the 182nd District Court of Harris County, to rule on relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus which alleges that he is being illegally restrained and was filed prior to his conviction. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied because his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus became moot after his conviction. See Hubbard v. State, 841 S.W.2d 33 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no writ); Morris v. State, 11-10-00332-CR, 2011 WL 1818059, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland May 12, 2011, pet. ref’d) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Further, as the party seeking relief, relator has the burden of providing this court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”). Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is also denied because he has not provided this court with a record establishing his right to mandamus relief. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, McCally, and Busby. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.