In re Avery Lamarr Ayers Appeal from 180th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed, in Part, and Denied, in Part, and Memorandum Opinion filed March 24, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00135-CR NO. 14-16-00136-CR IN RE AVERY LAMARR AYERS, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 180th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1473223 & 1476757 MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 23, 2016, relator Avery Lamarr Ayers filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Katherine Evans, presiding judge of the 180th District Court of Harris County, and the Honorable Susan Brown, Administrative Judge-Criminal Division of Harris County, to provide him a copy of the trial court record and to transfer a copy of the record to this court, where his appeal was pending. On October 6, 2015, the trial court sentenced relator to five years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice on relator’s plea of guilty to forgery of a financial instrument. Relator, proceeding pro se, filed his notice of appeal on January 25, 2016. The clerk’s record was filed in this court on March 1, 2016. This court dismissed relator’s appeal because relator’s notice of appeal was not filed timely and relator has no right to appeal because the trial court certified that it was a plea bargain case. See Ayers v. State, No. 14-16-00106-CR, 2016 WL 929385, at *1 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 10, 2016, no pet. h.) (not designated for publication). Relator’s request that we compel respondents to transfer a copy of the trial court record to this court is moot. Because relator has no right of appeal, he is not entitled to an order compelling respondents to provide him a copy of the record. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition, in part, as to his request that we compel respondents to transfer the record to this court and we deny the petition, in part, as relator’s request that we compel respondents to provide him with a copy of the record. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
