Miguel Angel Saucedo v. The State of Texas Appeal from 184th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 10, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00039-CR MIGUEL ANGEL SAUCEDO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 184th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1457905 MEMORANDUM OPINION After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to confinement for two years on October 27, 2015. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until January 5, 2016. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Donovan and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.