In re: The Tarics Law Firm, P.C. Appeal from 269th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed February 9, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00025-CV IN RE: THE TARICS LAW FIRM, P.C., Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 269th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-66578 MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 13, 2016, relator The Tarics Law Firm, P.C. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Dan Hinde, presiding judge of the 269th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his order signed on November 12, 2015, to the extent that it compels relator to participate in the arbitration. To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relator has not established that it does not have an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Gulf Exploration, LLC, 289 S.W.3d 836, 842–43 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding). We therefore deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.