Annice Hale v. Family Dollars Stores Appeal from 333rd District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motions Dismissed; Appeal Dismissed; and Memorandum Opinion filed March 24, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00020-CV ANNICE HALE, Appellant V. FAMILY DOLLARS STORES, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-17751 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed July 20, 2015. Appellant filed an untimely motion for new trial on October 3, 2015. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed January 8, 2016. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is signed when appellant has not filed a timely post-judgment motion. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-day period provided by Rule 26.3. On March 1, 2016, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed three documents since that time, but none of them demonstrates that this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. All pending motions are dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, McCally, and Busby. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
