In re Michael William Godfrey Appeal from 230th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 10, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00886-CR IN RE MICHAEL WILLIAM GODFREY, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 912345 MEMORANDUM OPINION On October 20, 2015, relator Michael William Godfrey filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Brad Hart, presiding judge of the 230th District Court of Harris County, to rule on his motion nunc pro tunc. On November 5, 2015, the trial court signed an order denying relator’s motion nunc pro tunc. Relator’s request for relief is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.