In Re Ronald Dwayne Whitfield Appeal from 351st District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 20, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00659-CR NO. 14-15-00660-CR NO. 14-15-00661-CR NO. 14-15-00662-CR IN RE RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 174th, 337th, and 351st District Courts Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 492674, 525468, 528856, and 557164 MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 5, 2015, relator Ronald Dwayne Whitfield filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial judges of the 174th, 337th, and 351st District Courts to render judgment. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. As the party seeking relief, relator has the burden of providing this Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”). Because relator has not provided an adequate record, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.