Dr. Abdul Memom and Abdul Q. Memom, M.D. & Associates Retirement Trust v. Michael Collins a/k/a Michael A. Collins a/k/a Michael C. Collins a/k/a Michael A.C. Collins Appeal from 152nd District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 30, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00350-CV DR. ABDUL MEMOM AND ABDUL Q. MEMOM, M.D. & ASSOCIATES RETIREMENT TRUST, Appellants V. MICHAEL COLLINS A/K/A MICHAEL A. COLLINS A/K/A MICHAEL C. COLLINS A/K/A MICHAEL A.C. COLLINS, Appellee On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-11000 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 25, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed February 23, 2015. To date, our records show that appellants have not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207. On May 1, 2015, this court ordered appellants to pay the appellate filing fee on or before May 11, 2015, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellants have not paid the appellate filing fee. Further, no clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellants did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On May 11, 2015, the court notified all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellants paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
