Christine E. Reule v. M & T Mortgage, M & T Bank Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Bayview Financial Trading Group, LP, Bayview Financial LP and Hughs, Watters, Askanase, LLP Appeal from 234th District Court of Harris County (concurring opinion )

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Affirmed and Majority, Concurring, and Dissenting Opinions filed October 29, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00502-CV CHRISTINE E. REULE, Appellant V. M & T MORTGAGE, M & T BANK, BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, BAYVIEW FINANCIAL TRADING GROUP, LP, BAYVIEW FINANCIAL LP, HUGHS, WATTERS, ASKANASE, LLP, CAROLYN TAYLOR, AUDREY LEWIS, JEFF LEVA, SANDY DASIGENIS, AND RLZ INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-75636 CONCURRING OPINION I join the majority opinion and write separately in light of the dissenting opinion’s contentions. Christine Reule is entitled to appropriate and respectful treatment in the litigation process. So is the trial court. So are the appellees and their counsel. So are the jurors who fulfilled their civic duty; heard her case; and had the duration of their jury service prolonged by her conduct. So are other litigants – including other pro se litigants – seeking their share of finite court time and resources to obtain timely resolution of disputes important to their lives. The trial court acted with restraint, patience, and courtesy during the proceedings below when faced with challenging conduct that frequently was disruptive, dilatory, and disrespectful. /s/ William J. Boyce Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally (McCally, J., majority) (Frost, C.J. dissenting). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.