In Re Jeremy Henderson Appeal from 209th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00965-CR NO. 14-14-00969-CR IN RE JEREMY HENDERSON, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 209th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1429504, 1435390 MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 3, 2014, relator Jeremy Henderson filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Michael McSpadden, presiding judge of the 209th District Court of Harris County, to perform an unspecified ministerial function. Relator makes a general allegation that the trial court has failed to perform a ministerial function and thereby deprived relator of due process, but relator does not identify the ministerial function the trial court allegedly failed to perform or provide any contextual details about the allegation. Relator also has not provided this court any documentation in support of his petition as is required. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Thus, relator has not satisfied his burden to demonstrate his entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.