Christine E. Reule v. John R. Belus Appeal from 190th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 23, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00574-CV NO. 14-14-00655-CV NO. 14-14-00772-CV CHRISTINE REULE, Appellant V. JOHN R. BELUS, Appellee On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-37325 MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 15, 2014, appellant filed a notice of accelerated appeal from the trial court s temporary injunction signed July 7, 2014, and the appeal was docketed under our case number 14-14-00574-CV. On August 11, 2014, appellant filed a notice of interlocutory appeal from the amended temporary injunction signed July 24, 2014, and a new appeal was docketed under our case number 14-14-00655-CV. On September 23, 2014, appellant filed a notice of accelerated appeal from the trial court s second amended temporary injunction signed September 18, 2014, and a new appeal was docketed under our case number 14-14-00772-CV. The appeals were ordered consolidated. On October 6, 2014, appellee filed a motion to dismiss these consolidated appeals as moot. Appellee filed a Notice of Nonsuit in the underlying case on October 3, 2014. A notice of nonsuit is effective immediately. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 162. A motion for nonsuit extinguishes a case or controversy from the moment the motion is filed. Univ. of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon, 195 S.W.3d 98, 100 (Tex. 2006). Appellee asserted in his certificate of conference on the motion to dismiss that the motion was filed at appellant s request. Nonetheless, the motion has been pending for more than ten days and appellant has not filed a response or objection to the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Accordingly, we grant the motion. These consolidated appeals are ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
